Noah Schlagenhauf vs Quin Verstegen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Schlagenhauf vs Q. Verstegen

Noah Schlagenhauf
GER
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
24
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Quin Verstegen
NED
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
24
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Schlagenhauf 1 - 0 Verstegen
They have played 3 sets in total, with Noah Schlagenhauf winning 2 and Quin Verstegen winning 1. The last match between Noah Schlagenhauf and Quin Verstegen was at the M25 Koksijde, 15-08-2022, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Noah Schlagenhauf getting the victory 4-6 6-3 12-10.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schlagenhauf | 1 |
| Verstegen | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Koksijde(08-15-22)
Noah Schlagenhauf
4
6
12
Quin Verstegen
6
3
10
N. Schlagenhauf vs Q. Verstegen H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.25% (75-56) | Career Total W/L | 38.89% (21-33) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Schlagenhauf vs Q. Verstegen Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Noah Schlagenhauf has won 43.59% of points on their second serve, while Quin Verstegen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Noah Schlagenhauf, in recent form, has won 50.00% of their opponent's second serve points, while Quin Verstegen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.28% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Noah Schlagenhauf has saved 46.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Quin Verstegen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Noah Schlagenhauf has won 59.09% of matches played (W/L 13/9), with Quin Verstegen winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Noah Schlagenhauf has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 75/53), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Quin Verstegen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 6/7), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Noah Schlagenhauf has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.09% of matches (W/L 13/9), where as Quin Verstegen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Noah Schlagenhauf winning 1 times and Quin Verstegen being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Noah Schlagenhauf winning 2 and Quin Verstegen winning 1.
- The last match between Noah Schlagenhauf and Quin Verstegen was at the M25 Koksijde, 15-08-2022, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Noah Schlagenhauf getting the victory 4-6 6-3 12-10.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:12:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Noah Schlagenhauf has played against opponents with an average rank of 182.95 while Quin Verstegen has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Noah Schlagenhauf has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Quin Verstegen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Noah Schlagenhauf has converted 27.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Quin Verstegen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Noah Schlagenhauf vs Quin Verstegen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Schlagenhauf vs Q. Verstegen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 22 | Games Won | 19 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:12:0 | Average Match Time | 2:12:0 |
| 68% (47/69) | 1st Serve % | 55% (37/67) |
| 64% (30/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (21/37) |
| 36% (8/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (11/30) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (4/13) |
| 52% (35/67) | Return Points Win % | 45% (31/69) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Schlagenhauf 45%, Verstegen 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Schlagenhauf 52%, Verstegen 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Schlagenhauf 53%, Verstegen 0%.
N. Schlagenhauf Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 3-6 10-7 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q. Verstegen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-4 4-6 13-11 | ||
Q1 | W | 4-6 6-4 10-8 | ||
Q3 | L | 4-6 6-3 12-10 | ||

N. Schlagenhauf vs Q. Verstegen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.25% (75/56) | YTD Win/Loss | 38.89% (21/33) |
| 56.14% (160/125) | Sets Win/Loss | 38.66% (46/73) |
| 53.13% (1462/1290) | Games Win/Loss | 46.42% (545/629) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 58.59% (75/53) | Clay Win/Loss | 37.50% (12/20) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 90 | Aces Total | 76 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 137 | Total Double Faults | 90 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 213.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 325.5 |
| 64% (2603/4055) | 1st Serve % | 50% (546/1096) |
| 63% (1632/2603) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (382/546) |
| 48% (697/1452) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (241/550) |
| 46% (208/449) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (44/106) |
| 43% (1776/4145) | Return Points Win % | 39% (430/1099) |
| 57.25% (75/56) | Futures W/L | 38.89% (21/33) |
| 57% (74/130) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (21/54) |
| 44% (8/18) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 27% (3/11) |
| 54% (13/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (7/11) |
| 94% (71/67) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (18/17) |
| 6% (71/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (18/1) |
| 13% (60/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (36/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 23 Nov, 12:20 PM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 09:30 AM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 01:00 PM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 08:00 AM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 09:00 AM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 04:40 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

22 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
00:50
H2H 0-0
03:30
H2H 0-0
06:00
H2H 0-0
11:10
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Hersonissos 7 Challenger
Greece
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Bhopal
India
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Hradec Kralove
Czech Republic
M25 Luanda
Angola